Nobel laureate, Prof. Wole Soyinka has condemned what he described as
crudity and vulgar abuse of language that has dominated the
electioneering campaigns in the country and blamed the presidency as the
major culprit.
Professor Soyinka, who spoke yesterday in
Lagos at the public presentation of a book titled “Modern and Tradition
Elite in the Politics of Lagos” written by Ambassador Patrick Dele Cole
also dismissed former President Olusegun Obasanjo’s book, “My Watch”, as
“three tonnes of doctored and self-serving narratives”, concluding
that, “a little learning is a dangerous thing.”
According to
Professor Soyinka, what the current political actors have done is to
take Nigeria to “hitherto imaginable low in the art of public persuasion
which – we have a right to imagine – forms the foundation of political
life.”
He said never before had Nigerians been so subjected to what
he called “sheer venom, crudity and vulgar abuse of language in such
prodigal quantities as in this current political exercise”, and accused
the Presidency of being “at the centre of this uncultured art of
political persuasion”.
His words: “All of us here have passed through
the electoral process furnace before now and I suspect we would mostly
agree that never before have we been subjected to this level of sheer
venom, crudity of and vulgar abuse of language in such prodigal
quantities as in this current political exercise.
“The very gift of
communication, considered the distinguishing mark of cultured humanity
even in polemical situations, has been debased, affecting even thought
processes, I often suspect. Speaking as objectively as is possible in
such circumstances, I would say that, among the various camps, the most
reckless and indecorous has sadly proved the incumbency camp, where
restraint has been thrown to the wind with such abandon that even highly
privileged spouses have publicly urged supporters to stone any voices
raised in opposition to their cause.”
Criticising Chief Obasanjo’s book, “My Watch” he descred it as “three tonnes of doctored and self-serving narratives”.
He,
therefore, tasked Dr Dele Cole, who was a former adviser to the former
president, to give Obasanjo tutorial on how to write history.
Soyinka
further asked Cole to investigate alleged allegations that the
Presidency was training some 1000 snipers and write about it. He argued
that there were more political murders during the former president’s
reign than at any other time, noting that even during Gen. Sani Abacha’s
time, he could not boast of 1000 snipers at his disposal.
Soyinka
also cautioned Cole for denigrating African religions by calling the
practitioners as ‘pagan’ in his book and warned, “any more of that
condescending stuff and I shall invoke Ogun, Sango and other Yoruba
deities to pay you a re-educational visit and then you‘ll see whether
your Christian eponymous patron saint, Saint Patrick, can save you from
their corrective can for your profanity.”
Chairman, Editorial Board
of The Guardian, Prof. Wale Omole praised Prof. Soyinka for doing a
“content-analysis of the book” through the review while asking other
book reviewers to take a cue from that formula.
In his review titled
“Learning From Yesterday”, Professor Soyinka commended the author, for
his efforts which made it possible to “weed out the pretenders in our
own time and evaluate the contributions of genuine leaders to the very
formulation of both our collective and individual identities such as
Herbert Macaulay and Henry Carr, who are captured in Cole’s book.
“Perhaps,
the most memorable personae in this work, for instance, are two pivotal
figures in the Nigerian nationalist struggle, even though convergence
from two contrasting personalities and ideological tendencies, and who
emerge as crucial protagonists and luminaries of this history in the
making.
It is impossible to think of either without invoking
possibilities of what other directions a colonial Nigeria could have
taken without the emergence of one or both – I refer here to the
flamboyant and tempestuous Herbert Macaulay, and the more reserved,
erudite and conservative Henry Carr – rivals, yet collaborators”, he
said
The author, in his remarks said, “I have pretensions of being an
academic at some point and I was teaching. The book that you have in
front of you is, in actual fact, my thesis for my Ph.D in the University
of Cambridge. I wrote it in 1974. The thesis itself was presented in
1969. But as Prof. Soyinka has pointed out, nothing much has changed.
The only thing that has changed is my singular failure to be able to
educate some Egba people on how to write properly.
”And the coming
together of the three main classes i.e. the tradition, the then elite,
and the educated others… these three groups came together to insist that
even the British subject should be treated accordingly. I am glad that
Prof. Soyinka had pointed out the highlights. The judiciary had been
messing up, and they would continue to do so unless there is change. I
will urge you to read the book. Though it is an academic work, but there
are quite some interesting moments.

No comments:
Post a Comment